The institution defines source precedence, evidence sufficiency, formulas, exceptions and authority. RSEEN turns that method into a versioned execution contract, applies it to source-linked inputs, records reviewer actions and replays frozen cases for comparison.
Resolvedcaught conflicts pass through authorised review
Decidedcredit authority remains with the institution
70/70 is an engineering baseline on a synthetic/development corpus: 7 deterministic controls × 10 same-process calls. It is not an end-to-end qualification result.
Evidence to authority
The control path that makes analysis defensible.
An explicit evidence contract governs when a value becomes an approved input, with every stop and review state left visible.
Models may assistFormulas and policy governAuthorised people decide
01Source pageDocument, page, snippet and case context
02Candidate evidenceProposed value with source, period, unit and confidence
03Evidence gatePromotion only when source, scope and method rules qualify
04Promoted inputComputation-ready value that retains provenance
05Formula computationDefined tables and ratios from qualified inputs
06Narrative checksClaims checked against cited evidence and computed tables
07Human decisionApprove, except or stop under named authority
08Attributable recordWho did what, when, and on what basis
Unsupported or uncertain→Gap or review task
Detected disagreement→Both values and citations, then human resolution
Missing method input→Output unavailable or grade withheld
Configured checks expose warn, block, unavailable and explicit-override states and keep them visible for review.
Method as a run contract
Defined by the institution. Executed with evidence.
The sequence is explicit: define the rules, encode the version, apply them to source-linked inputs, resolve exceptions, replay the result and retain institutional authority.
01Define
The institution defines the method.
Credit and risk owners set source hierarchy, corroboration rules, materiality, evidence sufficiency, formula definitions, tolerances, exceptions and decision authority before the measured run.
Thresholds and owners are fixed before results are opened.
02Encode
Policy becomes a versioned execution contract.
The Playbook records the institution's method in explicit rules and formulas, with a version, effective boundary and change history. A method change creates a new identity and a new comparison run.
The applied method can be traced to its exact version.
03Apply
Evidence enters before judgement.
Eligible Arabic and English files are read through digital-text or OCR paths. Material values retain document, page and excerpt; defined spreads, ratios and policy tests are computed from those source-linked inputs.
Defined credit arithmetic uses formulas, not generated prose.
04Resolve
Catch. Resolve. Decide.
RSEEN catches conflicting values and keeps both sources attributable. The reviewer resolves the conflict. The evidence rule then determines whether the case proceeds to a grade or pauses for completion; the institution makes the credit decision.
The system catches; the reviewer resolves; the institution decides.
05Replay
The same method can be run again.
Frozen inputs, method version and configuration are replayed and compared at value, score, grade, evidence-state and byte level. The first bounded engineering baseline returned 70/70 byte-identical deterministic renders.
Engineering baseline · synthetic/development corpus · not qualification.
06Govern
Method, review and decision remain attributable.
RSEEN records the applied method version and each workflow action in an append-only, attributable audit trail: who acted, when, and against which evidence. The institution owns the method and retains decision authority.
RSEEN applies and records; authorised people decide.
The method assigns each task to model, formula or authorised person
Language models may assist with
Classify eligible files and propose candidate evidence.
Extract candidate figures, each with its citation.
Draft the narrative around the computed tables.
Answer questions with cited passages from the file.
Challenge the draft in a second-stage integrity check.
Language models are not authorised to
Perform arithmetic in defined credit tables.
Silently select between conflicting sources.
Fill a missing method input with an estimate.
Invent an unsupported grade or change an approved Playbook.
Approve a credit decision.
One method, six recorded objects
Each object carries a version or attributable record into the run.
Sourcesprecedence, corroboration and tolerances
Evidencerequired fields and sufficiency rules
Formulasdefinitions, periods and rounding
Exceptionsreview path and authorised disposition
Versioneffective boundary and change history
Runinputs, outputs, reviewers and hashes
The institution's credit methodology remains its own. The Credit Control Blueprint records the workflow, evidence rules, formulas, Playbook version, deployment boundary and measured-pilot protocol. Client methodology, documents and derived data are never reused across clients.
Put the method under measurement.
Define the source rules, formulas, evidence conditions and authority, then test the difficult path in a controlled evidence session and design a measured pilot.